Bridgestone Turanza ER300 - User reviews

Sort:
coolmobil
3.2
These have tyres from April 2011. Actually Conti hunted for sport, but for lack of other options are purchased. Clincher in road works decently, although in my opinion it is quite loud. Requires reheat the harsher ride. Moving off the wet in my opinion, the drama - not a patch on the second Conti Sport Another thing that I have a heavy foot and drive my car to the front has more than 400 Nm. Overall, a decent tyre but knocks on his knees.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance2
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Volvo V50
3.1
I had previously Michelin HP and ContiSportContact3 both were a lot better, a lot better stability when driving above 170km / h Grip in dry or better during more aggressive starting with 1 and then 2 are able to activate the system. The worst thing about these tires is that the depreciation of inequality is HORRIBLE! rubber is hard as concrete, ride comfort is tragic (excluding motorways). As soon as you want to get rid of the gum. I bought them tempted by the price of the promotion as a sale, and unfortunately it was better to make a better gum. Tires 205/50/17

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Volvo V50 Kombi I 2.0 D
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance-
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
vengador
3.0
My tyre size is 195/50R15, the car is a 1998 Honda Civic 3D. The tyres are fitted to the front. I do not recommend to fit it to wheels narrower than 6.5J. I have them fitted to 5.5J and thay are terrible on such wheels! Pros - the tyre provides great braking on both dry and wet! There are no problems with driving in ruts, they don't swerve and they drain water better than winter tyres do. They are really comfortable, my 175/65R14 winter tyres are harder than them. Bridgestone Turanza ER300s are definitely better than eg. Toyo Proxes T1-R, Falken ZE 512s and 912s, Yokohama C drives 185/60R14. Cons - they're terrible in the corners, they have grip but "curl" terribly, in the corners they lose it on horizontal bumps, which is is their biggest drawback. In my opinion, the sidewall is a bit too soft like in T1-R, PX4 will probably be fitted next, because their sidewall is apparently harder. Loud, so far I haven't used any tyres louder than that. My overall rating is 4, I recommend bridgestone Turanza ER300s to people who drive safely and want to have a tire with excellent braking properties on both wet and dry. I don't recommend them for fast corners, especially for wheels narrower than 6.5J.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Honda Civic V 1.5i
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability3
mateo
3.0
Overall, the average tire, too much money. Much better to choose something Continental. Much cheaper and much better driveability. On dry asphalt somehow gives advice on wet is a tragedy, there is no mention of any stronger braking, ABS operates instantly, even with gentle touching the brake pedal. With the acceleration processes in the same way - on a dry road holding on wet asphalt stronger hitting the gas and the wheels lose traction, unfortunately. Cornering the early starts and you have to throw that in mind. Where is true for winter tyres enter quietly in corners at a speed of 90 km / h, it is unfortunately Brigestone 75 km / h, maximum 80. Until quite loud on some types of asphalt. The only plus is that it is quite durable. I made them approx. 70 thousand km. and still have 4-5 mm of the tread.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Toyota Avensis Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability4
luk
2.6
The Bridgestone Turanza ER300 were stock tyres fitted to a new car I bought. Previously I mostly used Goodyear Excellences. The tyre p;rovides good braking on dry pavement, grips properly in the corners, transmits toruqe very well during overtaking. You shouldn't expect anything more than that from such a tyre and it's all what I can positively say about this tyre. Cons: Very loud! Can't even be compared to Goodyear Excellence, it's even louder than winter Ultra Grips, which is terrible. Total aquaplaning! A 1,5 ton car with three people on board driving through a thin layer of water can drift forward at the speed of 60-65 MPH already - it's a total disaster. To sum up, I'm gonna wear this trash off as soon as I can and look for a different tyre. Or gonna move to the south of Europe for the summer.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:fast and dynamic
Vehicle:VW Passat 3C
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Mario
2.6
As long as the tyres loaded for a new car, or the appearance or quality. Even on a dry road can be normal for them to go but it is a veritable wet slide and this loud. Hopeless abrasion, after driving 40000 km were not suitable for use in practice and now landed in the trash and never again. I recommend avoid a big bow and do not suggest that the opinions here that are very good because many are already convinced that it is a very poor tyres and heavily overrated. And now it's time for something good, and this year the spring Passat will ride on Dunlopach SP Sport 9000 and the rest of the runs August slide on wet surfaces.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:only outside the city
Driving style:fast and dynamic
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance2
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Lee
2.6
Tyres on a dry run well, are soft. Appearance totally embarrassing but tyre 205 has rounded sides and a total area of ​​tyre contact with the road is small, such as the sides of the tyre 175 a round. If you want a sporty look of the car is do not buy these tyres because they look like the old grandfather. Hopelessness look exactly like a ball.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
majonez_zo
2.6
judge the poor tyres 4 because some WOZA wet in tight cornering on dry a little better (4 +), we can say that we stick to the asphalt, but they have a tendency to slide in the corners at higher speeds (around 120 and more). Regards potbelly

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:fast and dynamic
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
WICKI
2.6
These tyres would not have been quite that bad, but the rain drive on bad, do not stick to the road as you come into some sort of pool, throw it on the car, now I'm going to buy Dunlop SP Sport 01

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
RN
2.6
I bought based on ADAC test. Tyres were very good when they were new. Seemed to be perfect. Unfortunately, a lot of driving and it turned out that they were the fastest overlapping tyres I've had. With abrasion began to deteriorate, of course, its performance. At this time, I begin "wear" on the wet, and the tags are a little lacking. Generally recommended for people who drive a car only in "Sunday in the activist" and for those who drive a lot, but they can afford the annual purchase of new tyres.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Skoda Octavia
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability1
Total rating of the tyre
3.8
3.8
4.2
-
3.7
Buy