0800 066 3422
0800 066 3422
Today:
7:00 - 13:00
Click if you
live in Ireland
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Bridgestone Tyres
Pirelli Tyres
Imperial Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Oponeo
Tests and reviews
Tyre opinions Michelin Energy Saver
Michelin Energy Saver - User reviews
27
28
29
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
Alex
3.5
These tyres are a total disaster. I bought them in spring in 2009 with the 2008DOT. I made a technical inspection in the beggining of winter and they were totaly damaged. After 10.000 miles huge cracks along the tread appeared. When driving 60MPH they rumble like chinese crap. When the rain falls I feel like I cannot control my car ( I almost lose control of my car totally). Uniroyals or Firestones deal with wet road much better than these. I drove over 200.000 miles on different tyres (chinese, german, japanese)... These were probably the worst tyres that I have ever used in my entire life. I wouldn't recommend them even to my enemies.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Tomasz
3.4
Welcome. I bought these tyres because of the read reviews, tests and newspapers in various automotive and I have to admit that I was not disappointed, leading to extra, I drive turns confident and do not make noise like its predecessor, which is to reduce fuel consumption I am not able to comment because I never for This was not looking. One thing is for sure I would recommend these tyres to 100%
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and dynamic
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
MichaelGeorge
3.4
These tyres caused steering wheel wobbling in my car. On the balancing machine these tyres appeared to have un-even tread. I made an official complain to Michelin but they did not accept it. They considered my complain only after Oponeo intervention. (I am very thankfull to oponeo for that). Michelin send me new tyres but I decided to sell them rather than using them again and risk any other problems. Unfortunately, even Michelins- old and expensive brand- quality is poor.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Mercedes C180 '94
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
5
mk1
3.4
I tyres produced in England, I'm really happy with them. Called the rut is not stable, very good braking performance. I Fulda (the ruts worn) pirelli (unsung in the rain), Klöber so far these are the best recommended tyres
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
Max
3.4
Buying the most cost-effective. I'm very pleased. I go rather quickly so that the tyres at higher speeds you can not hear. I have to part with them "change car" but already thinking of buying new ones. I recommend
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Renault Clio
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
4
Piter
3.4
Very good tyres. I did not notice the difference in the behavior of the tyres on dry and wet surfaces compared to conventional tyres. What is actually saving fuel efficiency is low compared to conventional tyres. I recommend
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Mazda 323
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
Anpach
3.4
Recommended tyre. Actually quiet. Do you save fuel - I did not notice. In addition, I recommend a really good exercise in all conditions (except, of course, winter).
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
mik
3.4
Unfortunately lateral sipes on the tyre after 1 season pościerały is why I gave it 1 by attrition. Roar like winter tyres and winter tyres can roar as summer (winter tyres Nokian wr)
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
2
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
2
Feathering, durability
1
Leszek
3.4
The tyre abrasion resistant. Unfortunately, the wet need to be careful because it can "sail".
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
5
Piotr
3.4
Tyre very cool, worth the money - if only slightly better behaved on the wet asphalt ...
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
27
28
29
Total rating of the tyre
4.0
Comfort
4.1
Road
4.1
Off-Road
-
Cost
4.2
Buy