0800 066 3422
0800 066 3422
Today:
7:00 - 19:00
Click if you
live in Ireland
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Bridgestone Tyres
Pirelli Tyres
Imperial Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Oponeo
Tests and reviews
Tyre opinions Yokohama C Drive AC 02
Yokohama C Drive AC 02 - User reviews
3
4
5
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
Danny
4.1
I was wondering how long the tyre to choose. After a month of searching and reading hundreds of reviews fell on Yokohama (195/55R16). After half a year I'm really happy with them. It never happened, although for a moment I felt uneasy. On dry tyres like most even much cheaper acts around the wet well is (infinitely better than Bridgestonów tyre I had before). Not cheap but keeps AC02 AC01 class. I did not notice more wear and ride fast 200 hp car.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
5
Driving comfort
Noise level
1
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
P Harris
4.1
Have been running this model of tyre for a few years now and very happy with performance.
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Vauxhall Astra Hatchback H 1.8 (5/110)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
emer
4.1
I am not a representative of the Yokohama tyres but really doing good for the four most recently purchased, only one required a little balance on the wheel after insertion. It speaks for itself.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
3
JPSLON
4.0
Tyres are performing well generally. Significant higher rolling resistance.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
lb
4.0
Tyres really recommendable. Tyres behave very properly. Moving off without any problems (drive back + machine), also in the wet, as a powerful braking even with ABS pedal does not turn on (only in the wet, you can call this situation). Curves in dry conditions do not cause problems with wet little less likely, but far from losing traction. Aquaplaning judge on the 5th Volume, of course, also depends on the surface, but really hear the noise more air than the tyre. At 150km / h there is no tragedy. After the abrasion did not notice anything wrong, but I did not measure tyre, so I will not be spoken. I will only add that the opinions of accelerated wear or are exaggerated, or belong to people with very severe leg.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
Cristiano
4.0
recommend them to have a quick reference, no races, medium fine orders 130/140 160/170 then on the highway. The curves compared to the original Michelin earlier, I walk the 20km more.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and dynamic
Vehicle:
Citroen C4 Picasso II 1.6 e-HDi 115 Airdream (84kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
-
Feathering, durability
-
Maciek
3.8
Compared to my "former" Yokohama far exceeds them. Shifted velocity curves for greater braking if the anchor - immediately. No problems with moving my wet. I'm happy ...
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
ukmot
3.6
Poorly suited in the wet. You have to remember that.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000 miles
Place of use:
city only
Driving style:
fast and dynamic
Vehicle:
VW Jetta Sedan VI 2.0 TSI (147kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
-
Romek
3.5
Tires have not traveled a great distance but really cool look and is listed on dry pavement. Wet a little fall in the mild to master slides at agresywneiejszej driving. You can not hear them in the car for what is a plus. As for me, for the price of a small car really worth and the price is also attractive.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Seat Ibiza Hatchback IV 1.4 16V (74kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
pr
3.4
Tires very quiet and comfortable, but leave a lot to be desired in terms of adhesion - compared to my earlier used Pirelli P7 fall in this area poorly on fast cornering feel the slip. For super-quiet ride tire.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:
all terrain and outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Volvo V50 Kombi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
3
4
5
Total rating of the tyre
4.4
Comfort
4.3
Road
4.4
Off-Road
-
Cost
4.2
Buy