Continental ContiEcoContact EP - User reviews

Sort:
ced
2.6
Tyres very effective in all conditions. The only drawback is their volume. Znieszenia not exceeding 70 km / h

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption2
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Misza
2.6
Tyres are like new is OK but the older the worse (especially on wet asphalt). After 55 thousand on the front tyres tumors appeared.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Arek
2.6
Tyres in total about At higher ambient temperatures squeal like what I would consider a small minus.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
titi10
2.6
When driving a quiet rather not have high notes. Opel consumes minimal amounts of fuel.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Hiup
2.6
Bald tyres after 16 months of driving. During this time, their gum caught on the side of the tread, the tyre lost symmetry in the middle of the period.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
gregory
2.6
Perfect for dry road! In the wet is very slippery!! In comparison with the Pirelli 3000 is silent.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
baslaw
2.6
Decent tyres, but I rode a lot better. With the run over a distance worse behavior in the wet

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:fast and dynamic
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Piotrek
2.6
As for driving on dry and wet asphalt, comfort venom, or rolling resistance, I do not have those tyres (with my moderate driving style) any reservations. The problem is these super fast tyre wear. After driving less than 10000 km (with the correct geometry) outer edges of the tyres are completely devoid of tread small incisions (those on the ankle between the grooves where the task is to drain water). However, the same block outside of the tyre has shown a very high consumption in relation to the rest of the tyre tread. It is obvious that the tyre is rubbing, but that until such and is at less than 10000 km? With the above reason, I do not buy these tyres in the future. As for the ratings of behavior on snow and ice, issued in both cases 1, because I did not have the opportunity to test these tyres in such conditions. In winter riding on winter tyres.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability1
angus
2.6
Great tyre for the summer (because it is a summer tyre) and dry surface. In the rain (especially in the initial phase) a little bit slippery but just a little skill + common sense and should not be problems. Not the best exercises in deeper water (ruts, deep puddles). With a sharp decent ABS braking turn on really very rare (both dry and wet conditions). With koniczności przejeżdziłem one winter season but I will not judge. This is a winter not summer tyre. I gave the "ones" because in the winter, every summer tyre is "sucks" shortcoming of the tyre is its durability. the front of the tread 40 000 had a depth of 2 mm. Now they are almost bald.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability2
axe
2.6
on dry asphalt are some worse in the wet - especially the "harmonica" in front of the lights. Very often, I had a problem with driving away - then it was decent. Fast clash. To about 25,000 clashed normally - then "went lightning" After 40,000 set to replace (though apparently is not bad). after the disappearance of cuts (or about 30,000) in the deeper pools were hopeless. When you drive fast in a puddle tugging kirownicą (it was on the news). All in all not Charges - knowing how to behave in the rain just drove slowly. My rating - can be a little too fast but lost the tread. Now I bought a P3000

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Total rating of the tyre
2.8
3.1
2.8
-
3.0
Buy