Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ 205/65 R16 95 V MO

I considered choosing summer tyres for a long time and, after reading through a veritable sea of information and tests of tyres with similar parameters, rolling resistance, water dispersion, quietness etc., with full understanding I chose Michelin Energy Saver+. People tend to follow suggestions so with some trepidation regarding my choice I put on new tyres on the wheels, taking full responsibility for my choice. Now, while writing conclusions and sharing with you my opinion, having driven 15 thousand kilometers I can say that tyres are 10/10. In general, I drive somewhat dynamically, whenever conditions allow for it ;), and on a good day I'm able to drive at high speeds, even way above 200 km/h. When I "broke them in" and got used to them, I can say that these are very good tyres for summer days - quiet, properly elastic, they don't bend too much on sharp curves, significantly improve the traction and comfort of the vehicle, the car steers lightly but surely, as a driver we can predict what the vehicle can achieve during braking, aaccelerating or while traversing through difficult parts of the road. Lightness of steering results in lowered use of fuel but does not mean you lose on the grip factor; on the contrary, the car has a very good grip in both rain and when it's sunny! To sum it up, if you are aware of what safety on the road, braking distance and other forces of physics occuring during driving of a car are - you will enjoy driving on Michelin Energy Saver+. Cheers, Misiek. Read more Collapse

Michelin Energy Saver+ first impression: silence – I had never had such qui et tyres on my car. Second impression: low torque. Third impression: after about 1300 miles Michelin Energy Saver+ had to be driven aggressively – I had a feeling like I was sliding. Right now I am riding Michelin Energy Saver+ very sure , great band handling, ABS wasn’t on a single time. The only disadvantage is ( common for every French manufacturer ) the price, lower than couple years ago. Resuming: Michelin Energy Saver+ is ideal for people who want to have a decent tyre and not a race one. Michelin Energy Saver+ are daily use tyre which will turn comfortable, lower noise level, lower torque and lower wear. Another purchase: Michelin Energy Saver+. My car is Citroen Xsara Picasso Exclusive 2.0 HDI. Read more Collapse

I am a young driver who's had his driving licence for 7 years. I do not have much experience using many tyres from different manufacturers. For spring, I chose to purchase a set of summer Michelin tyres to have a guarantee of safety and comfort for both my loved ones and myself. The tyres turned out to be a great choice, fuel ussage dropped, to my great surprise, by 1.7l/100 km! The driving comfort is much higher than using Dębica. Tyres are very quiet, perfectly perform on both dry and in the wet. They surprised me very positively several times when I had to sharply brake. The car drives perfectly on these tyres on mountain roads full of curves. I recommend them for everyone, it's worth to invest in a good tyre in reasonable price. Read more Collapse

Tyres are a great fit for dry road but I think they perform a bit worse in the wet than Energy Saver (without the plus) I had before. However this could be due to a switch to a much heavier car. In general, I think in comparison to the previous tyres I had on Omega the difference is tremendous, so I rate them very well. During driving they speed quietly on the road - not always an even one. The car drives without any concern and one can even hear radio with speed of 160 km/h despite this being a hatchback. I recommend these tyres, I consider them to be a good investment. As far as damage factor goes - none so far and I hope it stays this way :) Cheers! Read more Collapse

These tyres truly have low rolling resistance. At higher speeds, that is on the highway, they are very quiet. Of course the same applies for lower speeds. Several times I drove on them in the rain, they behave without a fault. You can sense a degree of grip and stability on both dry and in the wet. The only fault is in my opinion too high loss of the tread depth in comparison to the amount of kilometers made. After 6 thousand km, the tread depth is 6 mm on the front and 6.5 mm on the back. In this sense, I'm a bit disappointed. Still, in comparison to other brands the use is still in the average. Summit it up, they're high class tyres. Read more Collapse